All AI memory papers

Σ-Mem maintains historical competence evidence matrices M_p, a peer relationship matrix G, a memory readout r_{p,t}, and residual steering δ_{p,t} to guide multi-agent trust decisions. On the mixed counterfactual benchmark, Σ-Mem raises Qwen3-0.6B accuracy at CF@90 from 46.22% with the base model to 71.10% with Σ w/ G.

TAG routes low-confidence steps to uncertainty-based routing, filters them with guarded acceptance with rollback, chooses between bank selection across rule and exemplar memory, and prunes via evidence-based retirement inside a unified control loop. On SVAMP and ASDiv, TAG reaches 81.0% and 85.2% accuracy, improving over the 74.0% and 77.5% no-memory baselines while a compute-matched Retry baseline stays flat.

Focus Agent adds start_focus, complete_focus, a persistent Knowledge block, and an optimized Persistent Bash plus String-Replace Editor scaffold to actively compress context during long software-engineering tasks. On five hard SWE-bench Lite instances against a Baseline ReAct agent, Focus Agent achieves 22.7% token reduction (14.9M → 11.5M) while matching 3/5 = 60% task success.

ActMem transforms dialogue history into atomic facts via Memory Fact Extraction, groups them with Fact Clustering, links them through a Memory KG Construction module, and uses Counterfactual-based Retrieval and Reasoning for action-aware answers. On ActMemEval, ActMem reaches 76.52% QA accuracy with DeepSeek-V3, beating LightMem’s 63.97% by 12.55 points and NaiveRAG’s 61.54%.

ADAM combines Anchor extraction, Distribution estimation, Anchor selection, and Query generation to adaptively probe agent memory via an auxiliary generator and entropy based selection. On the EHRAgent benchmark with Llama2-7b-chat, ADAM reaches EQ=77 and ASR=1.00, compared to MEXTRA’s EQ=44 and ASR=0.89.

AdaMem organizes dialogue history into Working Memory, Episodic Memory, Persona Memory, and Graph Memory coordinated by a Memory Agent, Research Agent, and Working Agent. On LoCoMo with GPT-4.1-mini, AdaMem achieves 44.65 F1 overall, beating the best baseline LangMem at 41.76 F1 by +2.89.

A-MAC scores candidate memories using Utility, Confidence, Novelty, Recency, and Type Prior combined by a learned linear admission policy with Algorithm 1 A-MAC Memory Admission. On the LoCoMo benchmark, A-MAC achieves F1 0.583 and 2644 ms latency, improving F1 by 0.042 and reducing latency by 1187 ms compared to A-mem.

LingBot-World combines a Data Engine, Fundamental World Model, Action-Conditioned World Model, and Post-Training causal adaptation to turn a 28B-parameter video generator into a real-time interactive world simulator. On the VBench benchmark, LingBot-World achieves a dynamic degree of 0.8857 versus 0.7612 for Yume-1.5, while also improving imaging quality to 0.6683.

Adaptive RAG Memory (ARM) augments a standard retriever–generator stack with a Dynamic Embedding Layer and Remembrance Engine that track usage statistics and apply selective remembrance and decay to embeddings. On a lightweight retrieval benchmark, ARM achieves NDCG@5 ≈ 0.9401 and Recall@5 = 1.000 with 22M parameters, matching larger baselines like gte-small while providing the best efficiency among ultra-efficient models.

Aeon restructures LLM memory using the Atlas, Trace, Semantic Lookaside Buffer, Write Ahead Log, and Sidecar Blob Arena inside a zero copy Core Shell kernel. Aeon achieves 4.70 ns INT8 dot products, 3.09 µs Atlas traversal at 100K nodes, 3.1× compression, and P99 read latency of 750 ns under 16 thread contention compared to FP32 and flat scan baselines.

AgenticAI-DialogGen chains ChatPreprocessor, KnowledgeExtractor, TopicAnalyzer, KnowledgeGraphBuilder, PersonaGenerator, DuelingChat Agent, ConversationValidator, ConversationRefiner, QAGeneration, and PostProcessing to turn raw multi-session chats into topic-guided, persona-grounded conversations with explicit short- and long-term memories. On the TGC / KG memory QA benchmark, Mistral-7B fine-tuned within AgenticAI-DialogGen achieves 87.36 F1, compared to GPT-4’s 83.77 F1 in a zero-shot setting on the same task.

Agentic Memory (AgeMem) exposes memory management tools, a three-stage progressive RL strategy, and step-wise GRPO directly inside the agent policy to jointly control long-term and short-term memory. On Qwen3-4B-Instruct, AgeMem attains 54.31% average performance across ALFWorld, SciWorld, PDDL, BabyAI, and HotpotQA, exceeding the best baseline A-Mem at 45.74%.

Agent Memory Below the Prompt stores each agent’s KV state in a block pool, quantizes it via a Q4 pipeline, reloads it with BatchQuantizedKVCache, and reuses it across phases using cross-phase context injection. On Gemma 3 12B, Agent Memory Below the Prompt reduces cold TTFT from 172,096 ms to 1,264 ms at 32K context (136×) compared to FP16 prefix caching baselines like vllm-mlx.

Agent Memory decomposes agent workloads into ingestion, memory construction, storage, retrieval, prompt assembly, generation, and maintenance, and classifies ten systems across four paradigms. Agent Memory’s profiling on MemoryAgentBench and MemoryArena reveals over 47× spread in lifecycle energy per correct answer and two orders of magnitude differences in serving latency across paradigms.

AGENTSYS organizes a Main Agent, Worker Agents, Intent Schemas, and an Alignment Validator into a hierarchical memory system that isolates raw tool outputs and only admits schema-validated JSON. On AgentDojo, AGENTSYS reaches 52.87% attacked utility and 0.78% ASR versus 48.27% and 30.66% for the No Defense baseline.

Neuro-Symbolic Dual Memory Framework uses Progress Memory, Feasibility Memory, a Blueprint Planner Agent, a Progress Monitor Agent, and an Actor Agent to decouple semantic progress guidance from executable feasibility checks. On ALFWorld, Neuro-Symbolic Dual Memory Framework achieves 94.78% success rate versus 88.81% for AWM, and on WebShop reaches 0.7132 score versus 0.5998 for WALL-E 2.0.

All-Mem organizes long-term agent memory through Online/Offline Decoupling, Agentic Topology Consolidation, and Topology-Aware Retrieval over a topology-structured memory bank. On LoCoMo, All-Mem reaches 54.63 4o-J versus Mem0’s 48.91, and on LongMemEval-S All-Mem reaches 60.20 4o-J versus Mem0’s 55.80.

AlpsBench combines Personalized Information Extraction, Personalized Information Update, Personalized Information Retrieval, and Personalized Information Utilization over 2,500 WildChat dialogues with human-verified structured memories. AlpsBench shows, for example, that Gemini-3 Flash scores 51.67 on Task 1 Extraction while DeepSeek Reasoner reaches 0.9569 retrieval recall with 100 distractors on AlpsBench.

AMA orchestrates four agents — the Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher — to build Raw Text, Fact Knowledge, and Episode Memory and route queries adaptively across these granularities. On the LoCoMo benchmark with GPT-4.1-mini, AMA achieves an overall LLM Score of 0.805 compared to Nemori’s 0.774, while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% relative to FullContext.

A-MBER builds multi-session conversational scenarios via a staged pipeline of persona specification, long-horizon planning, conversation generation, annotation, question construction, and benchmark-unit packaging. On A-MBER, a structured memory system reaches 0.69 judgment accuracy, 0.66 retrieval, and 0.65 explanation versus 0.34, 0.29, and 0.31 for a no-memory baseline.

AMemGym combines Structured Data Generation, On-Policy Interaction, Evaluation Metrics, and Meta-Evaluation to script user state trajectories, drive LLM-simulated role-play, and score write–read–utilization behavior. On AMemGym’s base configuration, AWE-(2,4,30) reaches a 0.291 normalized memory score on interactive evaluation, while native gpt-4.1-mini only achieves 0.203, exposing substantial gaps between memory agents and plain long-context LLMs.

AMV-L manages agent memory using a Memory Value Model, Tiered Lifecycle, Bounded Retrieval Path, and Lifecycle Manager to decouple retention from retrieval eligibility. Under a 70k-request long-running workload, AMV-L improves throughput from 9.027 to 36.977 req/s over TTL and reduces p99 latency from 5398.167 ms to 1233.430 ms while matching LRU’s retrieval quality.

Anatomy of Agentic Memory organizes agentic memory into four structures using components like Lightweight Semantic Memory, Entity-Centric and Personalized Memory, Episodic and Reflective Memory, and Structured and Hierarchical Memory. Anatomy of Agentic Memory then reports comparative results such as Nemori’s 0.781 semantic judge score on LoCoMo versus SimpleMem’s 0.298, and latency differences like 1.129s for Nemori versus 32.372s for MemoryOS.

APEX-EM combines a Procedural Knowledge Graph, Experience Memory store, PRGII workflow, Task Verifiers, and StructuralSignatureExtractor to store and reuse full procedural-episodic traces without changing model weights. On KGQAGen-10k, APEX-EM reaches 89.6% accuracy (95.3% CSR) versus 41.3% without memory and surpasses the GPT-4o w/ SP oracle at 84.9%.