Memory benchmark

LoCoMo

A dataset and evaluation benchmark for very long-term conversational memory across question answering, event summarization, and multimodal dialogue generation.

Scale

  • Very long conversations averaging 300 turns and 9K tokens across as many as 35 sessions.

Tasks

  • Question answering
  • Event summarization
  • Multimodal dialogue generation

What it measures

  • Long-range recall
  • Temporal reasoning
  • Causal reasoning
  • Multimodal memory

Original research

Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents

This is the paper that introduced LoCoMo.

arXiv:2402.17753

Used in the field

Papers evaluated on LoCoMo

Agent MemoryLong-Term Memory

Adaptive Memory Admission Control for LLM Agents

Guilin Zhang, Wei Jiang et al.

· 2026

A-MAC scores candidate memories using Utility, Confidence, Novelty, Recency, and Type Prior combined by a learned linear admission policy with Algorithm 1 A-MAC Memory Admission. On the LoCoMo benchmark, A-MAC achieves F1 0.583 and 2644 ms latency, improving F1 by 0.042 and reducing latency by 1187 ms compared to A-mem.

Agent MemoryLong-Term Memory

AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration

Weiquan Huang, Zixuan Wang et al.

· 2026

AMA orchestrates four agents — the Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher — to build Raw Text, Fact Knowledge, and Episode Memory and route queries adaptively across these granularities. On the LoCoMo benchmark with GPT-4.1-mini, AMA achieves an overall LLM Score of 0.805 compared to Nemori’s 0.774, while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% relative to FullContext.

SurveyAgent Memory

Anatomy of Agentic Memory: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of Evaluation and System Limitations

Dongming Jiang, Yi Li et al.

arXiv 2026 · 2026

Anatomy of Agentic Memory organizes agentic memory into four structures using components like Lightweight Semantic Memory, Entity-Centric and Personalized Memory, Episodic and Reflective Memory, and Structured and Hierarchical Memory. Anatomy of Agentic Memory then reports comparative results such as Nemori’s 0.781 semantic judge score on LoCoMo versus SimpleMem’s 0.298, and latency differences like 1.129s for Nemori versus 32.372s for MemoryOS.